Two horror directors, working on completely different projects with vastly different budgets, have made the same calculated gamble: they wrote sequel scripts before knowing whether their films would succeed commercially.
Na Hong-jin completed his follow-up to Hope based on Cannes reactions alone, while Curry Barker mapped out Obsession anthology concepts after just one weekend of box office numbers. This represents a significant departure from traditional sequel development, where studios wait for proven commercial performance before greenlighting follow-ups.
The confidence behind this approach reveals how horror has evolved from genre afterthought to strategic franchise foundation.
I think you can readily imagine this sequel. And there’s a script that’s already been done that I’d like to shoot.
Na Hong-jin told Fangoria about his Hope follow-up, essentially announcing a completed screenplay for a film that hadn’t proven its commercial viability yet. Meanwhile, Barker’s Obsession earned $16.1 million in its opening weekend, and he already had anthology expansion ideas ready: different characters making wishes in the same supernatural framework.
Strategic Confidence in Genre Reliability

This pre-writing phenomenon reflects the horror industry’s increased commercial confidence. Obsession‘s $16.1 million opening weekend demonstrates exactly why directors feel secure enough to invest time in speculative sequels. The film was made for under $1 million, making its commercial performance a clear validation of horror’s theatrical reliability.
Studios have increasingly recognized horror movies as one of the few reliable theatrical draws in an uncertain box office landscape. The confidence that studios have in sequels gives directors room to take bigger creative swings elsewhere, and that loop between commercial reliability and creative originality is proving a real boon for the horror genre.
Directors like Na Hong-jin and Barker understand they’re working in a genre where audience appetite often exceeds supply, particularly for original concepts that prove successful.
The industry is strategically treating established horror IP like major cinematic franchises, warranting higher budgets and premier talent commitments. Horror films are now being crafted for IMAX screens, racking up hundreds of millions in global ticket sales. This elevation justifies the speculative investment directors are making in sequel preparation.
Creative Insurance and Calculated Risks

Pre-written sequel scripts function as creative insurance policies, allowing directors to maintain continuity and capitalize quickly on audience interest. When Hope generated strong festival buzz at Cannes, Na Hong-jin was already positioned to move directly into production rather than starting development from scratch. Similarly, when Obsession proved its commercial viability, Barker could immediately discuss concrete expansion plans rather than vague possibilities.
The community response validates this strategic thinking. Horror audiences are vocal about their sequel appetite, with fans already imagining expanded narratives.
I want to see an anthology series of different wishes in the setting. Drug addict, wine mom, psychopath, tech CEO, warlord, etc.
One Reddit user posted, essentially mapping out the same anthology concept Barker had prepared. Another viewer responded to Obsession‘s success by noting, “This movie made me feel all of the emotions. Truly a masterpiece. It deserves the success it’s getting.“
This calculated risk-taking reflects horror’s unique position in contemporary cinema. Directors understand they’re working in a genre where strong execution often translates to commercial success, regardless of budget constraints.
The time investment in writing speculative sequels pays off when films connect with audiences, allowing creators to maintain momentum rather than lose years to development cycles. Horror’s proven theatrical draw gives directors confidence that good material will find its audience, making the sequel gamble worth taking.
